Benghazi-Gate, 'The Bob Schieffer Moment': Obama Administration Confronted on "Face the Nation"

This will go down as "The Bob Schieffer moment", where now even the media, which has given the Obama administration a hedge of protection, now has broadcast clearly that the administration deliberately misrepresented and is refusing to come clean about the Benghazi attack and their official story.

We all know when we are being lied to. It is clear now that CBS knows it too. "Why are YOU here?", Schieffer asks the rookie sent to "take care of that interview" from the Administration.  Then listen to what he says about Susan Rice's "representation" of the Benghazi event for the Administration (play from 1:20 minute mark).

It goes without saying that avoidance is a mark of cover-ups and lies. It's about time the mainstream media recovered their sense of smell as journalist hounds and started tracking the truth of the story instead of following the fake trails put down by the fox in the White House to cover their tracks (including Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State too). They are onto him now, and you can almost hear the media hounds line up baying and chasing behind CBS's Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation.  The old "bloodhound" reporter now knows the fox led them astray and their official story did not pass the smell test.  Isn't this what the media is supposed to do, as a public service for us? This is the purpose of a free press after all.

Remember too that while the Administration tried to satisfy the media by releasing a torrent of emails regarding the Benghazi event, that none of the emails that were released were dated any earlier than 67 hours--almost 3 full days--after the attack and the official explanations.  It would be insulting to not call it a cover-up, and from what Obama promised would be "the most transparent administration ever".  Actually, they would like it to be transparent...but only as transparent as a ghost or vapor that might quickly disappear.  But it's too late for that now.

Obama, Clinton Secret Meeting--Bilderberg Conference Nearby

Why the secret meeting, ditching the press corps? After both made speeches to AIPAC it is worthwhile to note where their secret meeting subsequent took place, in Virginia. The annual Bilderberg Conference was 3 miles away from Dulles in Chantilly, VA. How convenient! And the article goes on to talk of Feinstein's much publicized alibi about meeting in her home (but not the entire time). Of course attending publicly would paint a "global elite" label on both of them. (Both of them are in fact members of the Council on Foreign Relations). This indeed would be a real contrast between what Obama campaigns on (supposedly against NAFTA and big corporations that outsource, etc.) when Bilderberg members represent the very anti-thesis of his position.

Still trust Obama or Hillary? (This is not an endorsement of McCain either). Read the article in full.

Note the source here is World Net Daily (not just the maligned "conspiracy sites") and the entire press reported the secrecy and ditching of Obama's press entourage in particular.

clipped from www.worldnetdaily.com Speculation about Obama, Clinton attending Bilderberger meeting WASHINGTON – Sen. Barack Obama ditched his unsuspecting press entourage yesterday to attend a secretive meeting with Sen. Hillary Clinton. But where did that meeting take place? Was it at the secretive Bilderberg conference in Chantilly, Va.? So far, neither campaign is talking. The 56th Bilderberg meeting is still going on this weekend at the Westfields Marriott, according to various sources. But attendance is a well-guarded secret – along with the agenda, which tends toward the promotion of globalist ideas. Obama's spokesman Robert Gibbs confirmed Clinton and Obama met but declined to inform the press of the location of the meeting. Members of the press were outraged over the way Obama's campaign organizers covered up the meeting. Dulles is just three miles from the Westfields Marriott Hotel in Chantilly, where Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller, among other globalists, are gathered for the annual Bilderberg Group

Recollecting the Civil War; The Beginning of Wars for Democracy

clipped from www.civilwarhome.com Monday afternoon, about 2 or 3 o'clock, when we were sitting about in disconsolate fashion, distracted by the contradictory rumors, our negro cook rushed into the room with eyes shining and face working with excitement. She had been down in " de ten-acre lot to pick a few years of cawn," and she had seen a long train of wagons coming up from the ford, and " dey is full of wounded men, and de blood running outen dem dat deep," measuring on her outstretched arm to the shoulder. This horrible picture sent us flying to town, where we found the streets already crowded, the people all astir, and the foremont wagons, of what seemed an endless line, dis- charging their piteous burdens. The scene speedily became ghastly, but fortunately we could not stay tere were no preparations, no accommodations---the men could not be left in the street---what was to be done? Our women set bravely to work...they bandaged and bathed, with a devotion that went far to make up for their inexperience.

REALITIES OF WAR--THE CIVIL WAR CONFLICT LARGELY OVERLOOKED

A very moving account in this historical record (linked) above. This southern woman gives an account of caring for the thousands of wounded that day, describing in detail what modern authors cannot even imagine. Historical reality is very awakening and sobering to consider. People wrote with pen then more vividly than modern screen writers. These words of hers bring images from print to mind, the reality of a war unseen and erased from modern consciousness.

People today think little of the reality of war, beyond news and political debates. This moving and touching scene in this woman s account shows it up close and personal.

People should consider more what this war was really about if they consider the numbers involved, and that combat was often hand to hand, not bombing from a safe distance or high in the sky.

Historical Ammo comparison:
(left) modern 30-30 ammo used for deer hunting vs. Civil War rifle ball (right).
Provided courtesy of Civil War reenactor in Hurricane, WV. Which looks more deadly and powerful?

WARS FOR DEMOCRACY

The Civil War claimed over 620,000, more than all other U.S. wars combined to present, fighting not merely the Northern States but the Federal government in Washington! The fruits of Yankee-controlled government are now plain to see.

Since 1861 the Yankee Federal government has begun a policy of "regime change" toward global Democracy, i.e. "to rid the world of tyranny". (See Bush's State of the Union 2006 here). Operation Iraqi Freedom used the same excuse of "emancipation" of Iraqi's (without their call or consent) for Invasion, just like the Lincoln (first republican president) invasion of the South, burning their cities, just like Fallujah.

Wars for Democracy have clearly been the policy of Wilson (WWI), Roosevelt (WWII--"We must be the great arsenal of Democracy"), and all subsequent wars. This is why not only Bush, but republicans like McCain or democrats like Clinton or Obama offer no real "change" to this global policy. (Obama claims to "change the world", in his own words). Wars have all been fought for Democracy in the last 150 years, not "due to religion" as is often claimed. (Violent democratic agenda began at the French and Russian revolutions).

A recent Cato Institute podcast on the Civil War with a history professor in Pennsylvania bears this out, and is well worth brief reading and 5 minute listen.

THE SOUTH WAS RIGHT

James Henley Thornwell, D.D., a Presbyterian minister and President of South Carolina college (now USC) in 1861 put the South's position on the so-called Civil War in these terms in his treatise "Our Danger & Our Duty":

we are struggling for constitutional freedom. We are upholding the great principles which our fathers bequeathed us, and if we should succeed, and become, as we shall, the dominant nation of this continent, we shall perpetuate and diffuse the very liberty for which Washington bled, and which the heroes of the Revolution achieved. We are not revolutionists-- we are resisting revolution. We are upholding the true doctrines of the Federal Constitution. We are conservative. Our success is the triumph of all that has been considered established in the past. We can never become aggressive; we may absorb, but we can never invade for conquest, any neighboring State. The peace of the world is secured if our arms prevail.

A Spontaneous Skirmish, Civil War Days -- Hurricane, WV

Major Vote Fraud in NH Documented--Hillary Clinton's "Sexism" Trick

Obama and Ron Paul were projected in several (non-media sponsored) polls to do much better. It is possible for one or two polling companies to be wrong, but not all seven or eight. Rush Limbaugh and another pundit on 58Live with Agnello today basically lied, saying the "media" was at a loss to explain how THEY were wrong. What? The media did NOT conduct those pre-election polls. Rather Zogby, Rasmussen, and several others did, and they were right on the mark in Iowa.

One campaign trick should be admitted, the one Hillary Clinton pulled. There is circumstantial evidence that the men who yelled "Iron My Shirts", also printed clearly on a sign during a rally, was a planted provocateur, in order for Clinton to make the "sexism is alive and well" claim, and thus rally WOMEN to vote for her AT THE LAST MINUTE, thus overcoming the earlier polls potentially--or such would be their claim and explanation. (Yes, Hillary used sexism herself, to gain votes). See the video here, and note how Hillary calls "turn up the lights"--which then highlights the sign for the video! This is highly suspicious then, since she aided attention to the provocateur's sign! ‘Iron My Shirt!’: Screaming Men Disrupt Clinton Event in NH.

Before you disagree, be informed thoroughly, and the whole articles below. There is much more documented, especially by CLG here:

Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results By Lori Price 09 Jan 2008

2008 New Hampshire Democratic Primary Results --Total Democratic Votes: 286,139 - Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Hillary Clinton, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 39.618%
Clinton, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.908%
Barack Obama, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 36.309%
Obama, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 38.617%
Machine vs Hand:
Clinton: 4.709% (13,475 votes)
Obama: -2.308% (-6,604 votes)

2008 New Hampshire Republican Primary Results --Total Republican Votes: 236,378 Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Mitt Romney, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 33.075%
Romney, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 25.483%
Ron Paul, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 7.109%
Paul, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 9.221%
Machine vs Hand:
Romney: 7.592% (17,946 votes)
Paul: -2.112% (-4,991 votes)

NH: "First in the nation" (with corporate controlled secret vote counting) By Nancy Tobi 07 Jan 2008 81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as "Premier"). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots.

clipped from noworldsystem.com Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots. - Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. - The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a “human error,” Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How “human error” can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale - As soon as people went public with the fact that their votes in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies