Showing posts with label false flag. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false flag. Show all posts

Dec 8, 2010

Judge Napolitano of FOX's Freedom Watch Also No Longer Believes 9/11 Official Story!

Judge Andrew Napolitano, who hosts the FOX program Freedom Watch, just recently interviewed FOX associate Geraldo Rivera about his show (see previous post below) about 9/11 and Building 7 alleged "collapse".  Now the Judge has gone public himself, as shown in this recent clip, and no longer believes the official story about the destruction of Building 7 on September 11th can possibly be true. 

So now not one, but two FOX show hosts are on record as disbelieving the official story of 9/11 based due to the evidence presented on WTC 7.  Now since they have, why shouldn't we discuss this publicly?  This then is a clear mark that Political Correctness about 9/11 is finally being shattered in even main stream media, just as when the legendary boy shouted, "The Emporer has no clothes", and people more concerned about other's opinions of them, instead of plainly observable truth, were made ashamed.   The official story is clearly now open for debate publicly.


May 20, 2008

Iran Catches U.S. (Again) in "State-Sponsored Terrorism"

"We have made clear that any government that chooses to be an ally of terror[ism] has also chosen to be an enemy of civilization."
-- President George W. Bush, Sept. 5, 2006; source: White House

THE U.S. SPONSORS TERRORISM FOR POLITICAL CHANGE, PAST AND PRESENT

As harvested by CLG in a their newsfeed earlier the following stories, in even MSM sources, demonstrates that there is strong and damning evidence that the U.S. is itself involved in what it condemns, "state-sponsored terrorism", something that justifies open war against such states in the eyes of the Bush administration and many Americans.

While still unknown by most Americans (blinded by flag-waving) this is nothing new. U.S. covert actions are well documented, mainly involving the CIA, as in the overthrow of the Iran's Mossadeq and involvement with the junta government of Chili--both of which involved "blow-back" on US citizens in the form a Hostage Crisis in Iran and domestic assassinations, respectively. But it is now more hypocritical and inflammatory given the strong speeches condemning state-sponsored "terrorism" activities, violent acts "designed to influence political change".

Of course much of this will either be disavowed or justified, if admitted, or obfuscated, by the Bush administration and Pentagon. And the CIA never admits to anything, being the rogue agency they are, along with Special Operations and other unofficial or disavowed groups among defense contractors or private entities. But no wonder, provoked by similar declarations against their own military units, Iran declares the CIA as a terrorist entity, state-sponsored of course by the U.S.. Also note that Global Research fingered this activity over a year ago in their article Active CIA Terrorist Cells Operate Inside Iran.

The question in this is who is really acting "Tit for Tat?" Republican and former Presidential adviser Pat Buchanan (see Who's Behind the Proxy Wars?) says Iran is merely reacting to such covert actions against it, if we are to believe the unsupported claims of such at all. The following shows that Tehran has some goods on the U.S. in that regard, a "proxy war" being waged on Iran by arming other militant groups.

IRAN CATCHES U.S. IN STATE-SPONSORED TERRORISM ACTIVITY

Iran busts CIA terror network 18 May 2008 The Intelligence Ministry on Saturday released details of the detection and dismantling of a terrorist network affiliated to the United States. In a coordinated operation on May 7, Iranian intelligence agents arrested the terrorist network's members, who were identified in Fars, Khuzestan, Gilan, West Azerbaijan, and Tehran provinces, the Intelligence Ministry announcement said. The group's plans were devised in the U.S., according to the announcement, which added that they had planned to carry out a number of acts such as bombing scientific, educational, and religious centers, shooting people, and making public places in various cities insecure.

Iran says intercepted terrorist attack on Russian consulate 14 May 2008 Iran has arrested a terrorist group that planned to blow up the Russian consulate building in the town of Rasht near the Caspian Sea, the Iranian intelligence and security minister said on Wednesday. "This terrorist network, with links to the U.S., planned an explosion at the Russian consulate in Rasht, aiming to create a rift between Iran and its neighbors," Qolam Hosein Mohseni-Ejei was quoted by Fars news agency as saying.

Iran says mosque bombers also planned Russia attack 14 May 2008 Iran's intelligence minister said on Wednesday those behind a bomb blast in a mosque that killed 14 people last month also planned to target a Russian consulate in the Islamic state, an Iranian news agency reported. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused the United States, Israel and Britain on Tuesday of being responsible for the blast in the southern city of Shiraz that also wounded 200 people.

Iran holds U.S. responsible for terror attack on diplomats in Baghdad 17 May 2008 Iran has denounced a "terror attack" on its embassy staff in Baghdad and held the United States responsible for violating diplomatic immunity in Iraq, the official IRNA news agency reported on Saturday. Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki made the remarks, while strongly condemning the terror attack, said IRNA.

Iran blames US after diplomats are shot in Baghdad 18 May 2008 Iran angrily blamed the US on Friday after at least three of its diplomats were wounded in a Baghdad shooting, saying the US was encouraging attacks on Iranians in Iraq. The shooting, which may have been by Iraqi soldiers during an argument at a checkpoint, comes amid unprecedented strains between Iran and the Iraqi government, which has long been close to Tehran.

OBFUSCATION: SPINNING UNCOVERED COVERT ACTIONS INTO OPEN CAMPAIGNS

These actions documented above qualify, since they involve deliberate targetting especially of non-combatants and designed to spark fear and chaos, as "terrorism", state-sponsored by the U.S. (likely with Israel and UK involvement). When covert actions have their covers blown, it is necessary to invent a new cover story to justify the actions. This has now stepped into high gear, per this article and research, regarding one of the Pentagon's own brass unleashed for media purposes, and caught in action by CLG. Follow the story and links for yourself, and see just who may be doing "tit for tat", and who is the aggressor (based upon credible evidence), and who is the respondent.

Pentagon Propagandist General Calls for US to Sponsor Terrorism Against Iran By Bill W. 16 May 2008 Last month on Fox News, Ret. Gen. Thomas McInerney, one of the Pentagon's propaganda team of military analysts exposed by David Barstow in the NYT, openly called for the US to begin committing "tit-for-tat" terrorist attacks by proxy inside Iran: "Here's what I would suggest to you. Number one, we take the National Council for Resistance to Iran off the terrorist list that the Clinton Administration put them on as well as the Mujahedin-e Khalq at the Camp Ashraf in Iraq. Then I would start a tit-for-tat strategy which I wrote up in the Wall Street Journal a year ago: For every EFP that goes off and kills Americans, two go off in Iran. No questions asked. People don't have to know how it was done. It's a covert action. They become the most unlucky country in the world..." Media Matters' exhaustive research into the NYT story shows that McInerney appeared on Fox News 144 times since Jan 2002, and according to this bio from last year's "Intelligence Summit," McInerney is on the Board of Directors for several companies with defense-related contracts that would seem to benefit from his pro-war propaganda.

Jan 7, 2008

Were the U.S. and Israel Behind 9/11?

Now we have an "intelligence insider" view from former Italian President Francesco Cossiga that the CIA and Mossad were indeed responsible for 9/11 and that all the intelligence services know about it. The article documents other foreign dignitaries that believe the same and that Zionist beneficiaries had motive, means, and opportunity.

read more | digg story

Nov 24, 2007

Neocon Contractors Threaten Americans with Anthrax

The government never solved the anthrax attacks. It is clear that the evidence was planted, the letters from New Jersey (the home state of Michael Chertoff) said "Allah is great" and "take penicillin" and "Sept. 11th"--marks to mislead authorities to "Arab terrorists", attacks that were only made against leading Democrats in Congress (Daschle and Leahy)! Is it credible that "terrorists" would only attack leading Democrats, who resisted the PATRIOT ACT, until this happened? (Hint: This was done, as planted evidence indicates, by secret third party to push the neocon agenda and legislation, an act of coercion indeed).

Pay attention to who is warning us here. James Woolsey (former CIA chief) is a key neoconservative, member of the Project for New American Century (and many other neocon and Israeli think tanks), part of the secretive cabal that have hijacked the government since 9/11. This "terrorism expert" is with a leading private contractor of the Pentagon who earns his living from your tax dollars, in order to spread this same fear-mongering propaganda (without evidence) and obtain Pentagon contracts.

This is tantamount to threatening Americans, particularly since only the U.S. government controls the anthrax strains, the previous anthrax being traced to Ft. Detrick Maryland (yet no conviction). Before such warnings the government should be made to solve the previous anthrax crimes and be held accountable for the use of that anthrax which was obtained from government sources. (Who had access?). The U.S. also provided anthrax (per Senator Byrd's research) to Saddam Hussein of Iraq under previous administrations, along with West Nile virus, another strain warned of after 9/11.

One thing Woolsey does do here is demonstrate just how access to anthrax could be gained (thus he fronts possible conspiracy theories). One of such is to threaten someone, or scientists, in order to gain access. (It is also true that many such scientists world wide have been killed since 9/11). So why not apply what he states to the previous attacks, and increase security on those strains, instead of warning of future attacks to the people? The purpose of course here is propaganda, and "I told you so" is being set up, notably in a suggestion of public attacks, and the Academy Awards. Now why do you suppose he suggested that scenario--to Hollywood (that has produced critical films)? The purpose of this is to produce fear and to coerce (the definition of terrorism) the neoconservative agenda, of which he himself is a demonstrable part.
clipped from www.kansascity.com

U.S. remains vulnerable to anthrax attack, experts say


WASHINGTON | The United States is still “very poorly prepared” for an anthrax attack six years after a 2001 assault against Congress and television broadcasters, a former CIA director says.

“There is very little attention being paid to biological weapons,” former director James Woolsey said this week. “And that’s a shame.”

Woolsey spoke at a news conference called to release a report from ExecutiveAction, a Washington-based consultant, analyzing three anthrax attack scenarios, including a hypothetical attack at the Academy Awards.

Neil Livingston, ExecutiveAction chief executive officer, said the report was meant to be an “educational document” for the public and to show the risks that America faces.

“Terrorists could recruit a scientist at a laboratory who had access to a lethal strain of anthrax,” Livingston said. “Alternatively, they could break into a laboratory, bribe a scientist or threaten a scientist to obtain a sample.”

Nov 11, 2007

Caught in False-Flag: Jewish Student put up Swastikas

This as reported in a local NBC affiliate has vast implications, including that all hyped media reports of racial, religious, or political "hate crimes" should be carefully examined before believed blindly--e.g. the "hangman's nooses" around the Jenna case and other areas that recently popped up. Also the Anthrax letters that said "Allah is great"

read more | digg story

Oct 16, 2007

Neoconservative U.S. and Israeli Elements Behind Putin Threats

The alleged assassination threat against Putin is a clever one, of course charged at Islamic extremists. But what would be the motive for them, since Putin has defended Iran's right to nuclear power? The only parties with motive to assassinate or threaten Putin would be American-Israeli and neoconservative interests who are angry with Putin over his defense of Iran (including in the UN Security Council resolutions), not "Islamic jihadists". Motive, means, and opportunity for either feigned or real threats, or assassination, of Putin are with covert operations of the neoconservative and Israeli fifth column. Iranians have no plausible motive in doing such. The evidence per the article below supports this analysis.
------------------------------

Here is the threat matrix on Putin:

1. Threaten assassination and lay blame on Iranian militants or Islamic "terrorists". This has the benefit of providing cover for the true perpetrators and sets the stage for a false-flag assassination, shifting the advantage to the neoconservative war agenda.

a. Scenario A -- Putin is assassinated by Israeli MOSSAD or U.S. CIA covert ops, already both infiltrating Iran to foment revolution and violence to overthrow the government. Russia no longer defends Iran since Putin is killed during visit. This eliminates the major defense of Iran from any UN Security Council nation, thus paving the way for the Cheney and neoconservative led war on Iran.

b. Scenario B--Putin discouraged from attendance. This is not working, per article below.

c. Scenario C--Putin's Visit to Iran ends due to bomb or explosion, or other event. This cripples their relations, leading Putin to not trust Iran, or disintegrates and frustrates the purpose of the trip. Advantage to American-Israeli agenda would be that no photo ops showing Putin with Amadinejad together which would be a clear show of alliance in western media, especially since Putin has been with Bush at his ranch.
The neocons cannot bear seeing Putin meet with Ahmadinejad since Putin is an "ally" on the "war on terrorism".

Putin delays Iran visit amid plot report

By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV, Associated Press Writer

TEHRAN, Iran - Russian President Vladimir Putin pledged Monday to negotiate with Iran on behalf of the international community in their nuclear standoff, although he didn't come to Tehran as scheduled amid warnings of a possible assassination plot.

Putin's planned trip, the first here by a Kremlin leader since World War II, raised hopes that personal diplomacy could find a solution to the impasse over the Iranian nuclear program, but he delayed his arrival, which had been set for Monday evening.

The Russian leader insisted to reporters in Germany that he was going ahead with the trip, but the Kremlin declined to discuss details. The official Iranian news agency said late Monday that Putin had only put off his trip by several hours and would be in Tehran early Tuesday in time for a Caspian region summit.

"Putin will arrive in Tehran at the head of a delegation tomorrow morning," the Islamic Republic News Agency said, quoting Iran's presidential press service.

Iran gave no further details, and Kremlin officials wouldn't comment on reasons for the delay or say exactly when Putin would arrive. Officials in Germany, where Putin wrapped up a two-day visit, said they could not say where the Russian leader was.

Putin's trip was first thrown into doubt when the Kremlin said Sunday that he had been informed by Russian special services that suicide attackers might try to kill him in Tehran, but he shrugged off the warning Monday.

"Of course I am going to Iran," he said after talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. "If I always listened to all the various threats and the recommendations of the special services I would never leave home."

The remark played into the carefully crafted image of a fearless leader that Putin has cultivated, and also appeared aimed at emphasizing that he is in control — not under undue influence from security officials — as he maneuvers to maintain influence after his presidential term ends next year.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini dismissed reports about the purported assassination plot as disinformation spread by adversaries hoping to spoil good relations between Russia and Iran.

Putin has warned the U.S. and other nations against trying to coerce Iran into reining in its nuclear program and insists peaceful dialogue is the only way to deal with Tehran's defiance of a U.N. Security Council demand that it suspend uranium enrichment.

"Threatening someone, in this case the Iranian leadership and Iranian people, will lead nowhere," Putin said in Germany. "They are not afraid, believe me."

Iran's rejection of the council's demand and its previous clandestine atomic work has fed suspicions in the U.S. and other countries that Tehran is working to enrich uranium to a purity usable in nuclear weapons. Iran insists it is only wants lesser-enriched uranium to fuel nuclear reactors that would generate electricity.

Putin's visit to Tehran, the first such trip by a Kremlin leader since Josef Stalin attended a 1943 wartime summit with Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt, is being closely watched for any possible shifts in Russia's carefully hedged stance in the nuclear standoff.

The Russian president underlined his disagreements with Washington last week, saying he saw no "objective data" to prove Western claims that Iran is trying to construct nuclear weapons.

Russia, which is building Iran's first nuclear power plant, has resisted the push by the U.S. and its allies for stronger U.N. sanctions against Tehran and strongly warned Washington against using force.

"Putin's trip to Tehran is a show of Russia's independence in global affairs. Putin, who approaches the end of his term, wants to demonstrate that he wouldn't cave in to the U.S. pressure," said Alexander Pikayev, an expert on Iran with Russia's Institute for World Economy and International Relations.

Putin emphasized Monday that he would negotiate in Tehran on behalf of the five permanent U.N. Security Council members — United States, Russia, China, Britain and France — and Germany, a group that has led efforts to resolve the stalemate with Tehran.

He said the group "can and must be patient" in dealing with the Iranian leadership.

"If we have a chance to maintain such direct contact, we will do it expecting a positive and, I will stress, joint result," Putin said. "Because Russia has worked and intends to continue to work with partners in Europe and the United States to achieve a common goal."

In Washington, State Department spokesman Tom Casey said the U.S. government expected Putin to "convey the concerns shared by all of us about the failure of Iran to comply with the international community's requirements concerning its nuclear program."

Putin's schedule called for meetings with hard-line Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the country's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei. He also was to participate in a meeting Tuesday of the leaders of nations bordering the Caspian Sea, which are arguing over division of its oil.

While the Kremlin has shielded Tehran from a U.S. push for a third round of U.N. sanctions, Iran has voiced annoyance about Moscow's foot-dragging in building a nuclear power plant in the southern port of Bushehr under a $1 billion contract.

Russia warned early this year that the plant wouldn't be launched this fall as planned because Iran was slow in making payments. Iranian officials have angrily denied any payment arrears and accused the Kremlin of caving in to Western pressure.

Moscow also has ignored Iranian demands to ship fuel for the plant, saying it would be delivered only six months before the Bushehr plant goes on line. The launch date has been delayed indefinitely amid the payment dispute.

Any sign by Putin that Russia could quickly complete the power plant would embolden Iran and further cloud Russia's relations with the West.

But Putin's trip would be important for Iran even if it yielded no agreements. "It's a break in international isolation, a chance to show that Iran is an important country," Pikayev, the analyst, told the AP.

Iranian media also emphasized the importance of Putin's trip. "Iran can use the visit to lobby for getting our nuclear dossier out of the U.N. Security Council and Russia can strengthen its opposition to the U.S. through boosting ties with Tehran," the hard-line newspaper Resalat said in an editorial.

NEWS RELEASE ABOUT PUTIN'S VISIT TO IRAN

Sep 14, 2007

9/11 Revisited: Former Reagan Administration Official Defends "Truthers"

This article is link to its original post at VDARE.com, and its a must read for West Virginia media, radio talk shows, republicans and democrats alike. The entire Bush administration agenda is based upon the foundation of the official story of 9/11. If that foundation is faulty or false, the entire administration falls with it. Yet for some reason, as Paul Craig Roberts records, the "liberal media" is strangely silent or outright condemning any questioning of 9/11 (interesting isn't it?), while 36 percent of the population (see source in article) and 50 percent of New Yorkers believe it to be in some way either false or entire fiction. THIS IS A MUST READ FOR REPUBLICAN SKEPTICS ESPECIALLY.



September 10, 2007

9-11, Six Years Later

By Paul Craig Roberts

On Sept. 7, National Public Radio reported that Muslims in the Middle East were beginning to believe that the 9-11 attacks on the WTC and Pentagon were false flag operations committed by some part of the U.S. and/ or Israeli government.

It was beyond the imagination of the NPR reporter and producer that there could be any substance to these beliefs, which were attributed to the influence of books by U.S. and European authors sold in bookstores in Egypt.

NPR's concern was that books by Western authors questioning the origin of the 9-11 attack have the undesirable result of removing guilt from Muslims' shoulders.

The NPR reporter, Ursula Lindsey, said that "here in the U.S., most people have little doubt about what happened during the 2001 attacks."

NPR's assumption that the official 9-11 story is the final word is uninformed. Polls show that 36 percent of Americans and more than 50 percent of New Yorkers lack confidence in the 9-11 commission report. Many 9-11 families who lost relatives in the attacks are unsatisfied with the official story....

....

The 9-11 commission was a political commission run by Bush administration insider Philip Zelikow. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, the head of which is a member of President Bush's Cabinet.

Zelikow was a member of President Bush's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, a neoconservative stronghold. In February 2005, Zelikow was appointed counselor of the U.S. Department of State. Obviously, there was zero possibility that the 9-11 commission would hold any part of the Bush administration accountable for the numerous failures of U.S. government agencies on Sept. 11, much less would the commission investigate for any complicity.

If one looks at the credentials of skeptics compared to the credentials of defenders of the official line, it is impossible to dismiss skeptics as kooks. There are many people with strong imaginations on the Internet, but serious skeptics stick to known facts, known violations of standard procedures and the laws of physics. The vast majority of the people who call skeptics "kooks" are themselves ignorant of physics and have little comprehension of the improbability that such an attack could succeed without either the complicity or complete failure of government agencies...........

....Who are the beneficiaries of 9-11? The answer is: the military-security complex, which has accumulated tens of billions of dollars in profits; U.S. oil companies, which hope to get their hands on Iraqi and perhaps Iranian oil; the Republican Party, which saved a vulnerable newly elected president, George W. Bush, viewed by many as illegitimately elected by one vote of the Supreme Court, by wrapping him in the flag as "war president"; the Republican Federalist Society, which used 9-11 to achieve its goal of concentrating power in the executive; Vice President Dick Cheney and the neoconservatives, who used the "new Pearl Harbor" to implement their "Project for a New American Century" and extend American hegemony over the Middle East; and right-wing Israeli Zionists, who have successfully used American blood and treasure to eliminate obstacles to Israeli territorial expansion.

(continued at VDARE link above)



Sep 7, 2007

STOP THE BIG LIE: Bin Laden Absolutely Denied Involvement in 9/11.




"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."


--Joseph Goebbels, Nazi propagandist



Six years after the fact we still have to repeat this, but the proof has become conclusive.

What evidence does the government have that 9/11 was committed by "Islamic jihadists"? Only allegation and repetition have sustained the lie.


1. Usama Bin Laden's absolutely, unequivocally, and immediately denied any knowledge or involvement in an interview published in Pakistani (U.S. ally) press after he was blamed:


"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people….


What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United States? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. "


--Osama bin Laden interview with Ummat, 28 September 2001

Sources: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan - Friday, 28 September 2001 - pages 1, 7. - Source: BBC Monitoring Service

http://www.public-action.com/911/oblintrv.html

[this writer found it shortly after, along with others, and retained original links to Ummat's article to this day]

2. The government's spurious video evidence, claiming that he "boasted" is contradicted by his published denial above in Pakistani press. The video produced back in 2001, like the ones subsequent and including this week, are forgeries, and indeed intended for "propaganda"--i.e. for the neoconservative legislative and foreign policy agenda to be leveraged through this lie. As for the tape:
"It's bogus," says Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's Religious Studies program.
The video is further examined here:

3. The testimony of the FBI is that there is "no hard evidence" linking Bin Laden to 9/11:
"The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
--Rex Tomb, FBI spokesman, in interview with Muckraker Report

The FBI is well informed of the video (proves Muckraker Report), but, nonetheless, still considers that there is "no hard evidence" to connect Bin Laden with 9/11. Thus again, the video cannot be considered said evidence. People can argue with the FBI about this if they want, instead of us.

There is therefore no sustainable evidence except politically-convenient allegation and propaganda, to make such a false and spurious claim that Bin Laden was behind 9/11.
This also kills, by corollary, the idea of Al Qaeda which they claim also was connected directly with Bin Laden. The BBC documentary "Power of Nightmares" documents that Al Qaeda was "an invention" of the U.S. government, and that videos of Bin Laden "were faked for the western media", with "militants" called in for the purpose. (See this video on the right side of this blog).

SO WHY DOES THE MEDIA, GOVERNMENT, AND OFFICIALS ALL TALK AS IF THIS IS A PROVEN "FACT"?

CONCLUSION: THE GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA (AND 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT) ARE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.



--Joseph Goebbels, Nazi propagandist


They will not stop parroting this BIG LIE unless the public loudly rebukes them, and legally stops them, and their political machinery, for repeating blatant lies.

SO WHO WAS BEHIND THE 9/11 ATTACKS IF NOT BIN LADEN?

Bin Laden states that the U.S. government is using "propaganda" against him and Taleban while they deny any involvement, and that American media is helping in that effort. Bin Laden himself speculates (as a former CIA asset, familiar with U.S. covert operations) and claims that a "secret government within the government of the United States" knows, and fingers Israeli elements, the "American-Jews" within the system "who control it". This could be a direct reference to the neoconservatives, largely Jewish Zionists, such as the Project for New American Century cabal embedded within the Bush administration, Pentagon, and its contractors,
(e.g. Booz Hamilton, where James Woolsey and the new National Intelligence director Mike McConnell, and former Pentagon comptroller Rabbi Dov Zakheim are).as well as the Media Networks whose heads are largely Jewish Zionists, who control American's perceptions through news. (Note: Not all Jews are Zionists. Orthodox Jews decry and protest both Israel and Zionism). In addition, recall from our previous article below that Larry Silverstein, who purchased the WTC lease six weeks prior to 9/11 and profited from the "terrorism" insurance policy, is close friends with Netanyahu of Israel, the extremist Likudnik party. Also recall that VP Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush were also in the Project for a New American Century, and that the rogue and secretive Office of Special Plans in the Pentagon usurped authority and by-passed the CIA in regards to "intelligence" which provided the deceitful premise of attacking Iraq. George W. Bush happened to be in Florida, "visiting my brother Jeb" the day before, and on the morning of 9/11 claimed to see the first "plane hit the tower" on "a TV", before entering the classroom (while there was no live television coverage), during which time the second plane hit, and Andy Card then made the famous whisper in his ear.


Here is the full text of the Ummat interview with Bin Laden--a must read!

Following is the text of Usama Bin Laden's interview conducted by a "special correspondent" and published in the daily Ummat on Friday, 28 September 2001. [The place and date of the interview was not given by Ummat.]

Daily UMMAT: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?

USAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (saw) for our guidance. I am thankful to The Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).

I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries [Ed. Saudi Arabia, et al] is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.

The U.S. has no friends, nor does it want to keep any because the prerequisite of friendship is to come to the level of the friend or consider him at par with you. America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates. However, our case is different. We have pledged slavery to God Almighty alone and after this pledge there is no possibility to become the slave of someone else. If we do that it will be disregardful to both our Sustainer and his fellow beings. Most of the world nations upholding their freedom are the religious ones, which are the enemies of the United States, or the U.S. itself considers them as its enemies.

The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.

Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.

Daily UMMAT: A number of world countries have joined the call of the United States for launching attacks on Afghanistan. These also include a number of Muslim countries. Will Al-Qaida declare a jehad against these Islamic countries as well?

USAMA BIN LADEN: I must say that my duty is just to awaken the Muslims; to tell them as to what is good for them and what is not. What does Islam says and what the enemies of Islam want? Al-Qaida was set up to wage a jehad against infidelity, particularly to counter the onslaught of the infidel countries against the Islamic states. Jehad is the sixth undeclared pillar of Islam. [The first five being the basic holy words of Islam (There is only one God in the entire universe and Muhammad is the last Prophet of God), prayers, fast, pilgrimage to Mecca and giving alms (zakat).] Every anti-Islamic person is afraid of jehad. Al-Qaida wants to keep jehad alive and active and make it a part of the daily life of the Muslims. It wants to give it the status of worship. We are not against any Islamic country. We do not consider a war against an Islamic country as jehad. We are in favour of armed jehad only against those infidel governments, which are killing innocent Muslim men, women and children just because they are Muslims. Supporting the U.S. act is the need of some Muslim countries and the compulsion of others. However, they should think as to what will remain of their religious and moral position if they support the attack of the Christians and the Jews on a Muslim country like Afghanistan. The orders of Islamic Shariah [jurisprudence] for such individuals, organizations and countries are clear and all the scholars of the Muslim brotherhood are unanimous on them. We will do the same, which is being ordered by the Ameer-ul-Momeneen [the commander of the faithful Afghans] Muhammad Omar and the Islamic scholars. The hearts of the people of Muslim countries are beating with the call of jehad. We are grateful to them.

Daily UMMAT: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the U.S.is not too difficult. U.S. experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is Al-Qaida not targeting their economic pillars?

USAMA BIN LADEN: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.

Daily UMMAT: Why is harm not caused to the enemies of Islam through other means, apart from the armed struggle? For instance, urging the Muslims to boycott Western products, banks, shipping lines and TV channels.

USAMA BIN LADEN: The first thing is that Western products could only be boycotted when the Muslim fraternity is fully awakened and organized. Secondly, the Muslim companies should become self-sufficient in producing goods equal to the products of Western companies. Economic boycott of the West is not possible unless economic self-sufficiency is attained and substitute products are brought out. You see that wealth is scattered all across the Muslim World but not a single TV channel has been acquired which can preach Islamic injunctions according to modern requirements and attain an international influence. Muslim traders and philanthropists should make it a point that if the weapon of public opinion is to be used, it is to be kept in the hand. Today's world is of public opinion and the fates of nations are determined through its pressure. Once the tools for building public opinion are obtained, everything that you asked for can be done.

Daily UMMAT: The entire propaganda about your struggle has so far been made by the Western media. But no information is being received from your sources about the network of Al-Qaida and its jehadi successes. Would you comment?

USAMA BIN LADEN: In fact, the Western media is left with nothing else. It has no other theme to survive for a long time. Then we have many other things to do. The struggle for jehad and the successes are for the sake of Allah and not to annoy His bondsmen. Our silence is our real propaganda. Rejections, explanations, or corrigendum only waste your time and through them, the enemy wants you to engage in things which are not of use to you. These things are pulling you away from your cause. The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness.

Daily UMMAT: What will be the impact of the freeze of Al-Qaida accounts by the U.S.?

USAMA BIN LADEN: God opens up ways for those who work for Him. Freezing of accounts will not make any difference for Al-Qaida or other jehad groups. With the grace of Allah, Al-Qaida has more than three alternative financial systems, which are all separate and totally independent from each other. This system is operating under the patronage of those who love jehad. What to say of the United States, even the combined world cannot budge these people from their path. These people are not in hundreds but in thousands and millions. Al-Qaida comprises of such modern educated youths who are aware of the cracks inside the Western financial system as they are aware of the lines in their hands. These are the very flaws of the Western fiscal system, which are becoming a noose for it and this system could not recuperate in spite of the passage of so many days.

Daily UMMAT: Are there other safe areas other than Afghanistan, where you can continue jehad?

USAMA BIN LADEN: There are areas in all parts of the world where strong jehadi forces are present, from Indonesia to Algeria, from Kabul to Chechnya, from Bosnia to Sudan, and from Burma to Kashmir. Then it is not the problem of my person. I am a helpless fellowman of God, constantly in the fear of my accountability before God. It is not the question of Usama but of Islam and, in Islam too, of jehad. Thanks to God, those waging a jehad can walk today with their heads raised. Jehad was still present when there was no Usama and it will remain as such even when Usama is no longer there. Allah opens up ways and creates loves in the hearts of people for those who walk on the path of Allah with their lives, property and children. Believe it, through jehad, a man gets everything he desires. And the biggest desire of a Muslim is the life after death. Martyrdom is the shortest way of attaining an eternal life.

Daily UMMAT: What do you say about the Pakistan Government policy on Afghanistan attack?

USAMA BIN LADEN: We are thankful to the Momin and valiant people of Pakistan who erected a blockade in front of the evil forces and stood in the first file of battle. Pakistan is a great hope for the Islamic brotherhood. Its people are awakened, organized and rich in the spirit of faith. They backed Afghanistan in its war against the Soviet Union and extended every help to the mojahedeen (freedom fighters) and the Afghan people. Then these are very Pakistanis who are standing shoulder by shoulder with the Taleban. If such people emerge in just two countries, the domination of the West will diminish in a matter of days. Our hearts beat with Pakistan and, God forbid, if a difficult time comes we will protect it with our blood. Pakistan is sacred for us like a place of worship. We are the people of jehad and fighting for the defense of Pakistan is the best of all jehads to us. It does not matter for us as to who reforms Pakistan. The important thing is that the spirit of jehad is alive and stronger in the hearts of the Pakistani people.

- Source: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan - Friday, 28 September 2001 - pages 1, 7. - Source: BBC Monitoring Service. - Source: http://www.khilafah.comhttp://www.khilafah.com/1421/category.php?DocumentID=2392&TagID=2

Carol A. Valentine President, Public Action, Inc. Copyright, October, 2001. May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes.

4. Usama Bin Laden has been dead since December 2001, of poor health.
Translation of Funeral Article in Egyptian Paper:
al-Wafd, Wednesday, December 26, 2001 Vol 15 No 4633

News of Bin Laden's Death
and Funeral 10 days ago

Islamabad -
A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa'da organization, stating that binLaden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death.


CBS News | FBI Official Thinks Bin Laden Is Dead | July 17, 2002



CNN.com - Officials, friends can't confirm Bin Laden death report


AP Article, 4/26/02, by ROBERT BURNS

"We're hunting him down," he said. "We're tracking him down. He's hiding. We haven't heard hide nor hair of him for about, oh, since December, in terms of anything hard." Rumsfeld said...




--------------
More Analysis Here:

Proof that Bin Laden had no links with 9/11 and the Bin Laden tape ...
By Ahmed Ismail
... is clearly guilty of obstruction of justice at best, high treason and conspiracy to mass murder at worst. Since the FBI now tells us that Osama Bin Laden is "not wanted for 9/11 because there is "no hard evidence" connecting him to ...
Ahmed Ismail - http://ahmedismailibrahim.wordpress.com

Jul 23, 2007

Reagan Official Warns of a False-flag 'Second 9/11' to Cement Neo-Republican Power

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.

--Thomas Jefferson


Paul Craig Roberts has not kept silent. An important radio interview with Paul Craig Roberts of the Reagan administration (see link below).

Note: Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com

WAKE-UP CALL! A FALSE-FLAG 'SECOND 9/11' COMING PRIOR TO 2008 ELECTIONS

"False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own."
-- Wickipedia
This Reagan Administration official warns Americans to be suspicious of the very real possibility of a false-flag Second 9/11 "attack" to cement neoconservative republican political power, and to revive both the foreign wars and domestic terrorism policies being met with resistance. HE IS DEAD SERIOUS! If not a second 9/11, certainly sufficient "news" or "terror" headlines to terrorize Americans into supporting the vague, perpetual "war on terror" and tyrannical domestic legislation (REAL ID, Homeland Security, PATRIOT ACT continuity, etc.). He mentions Iran as a theatre that Cheney, leading the neoconservative charge, is hell-bent on getting America into before Bush leaves office.

If and when this happens remember it was forewarned of as an event to benefit the present agendas, foreign and domestic, and that no terrorist motive could possibly exist to give Americans a reason to change their minds about an unpopular neoconservative President's policies and agenda. Why would terrorists attack now (as the controlled media is now warning in this political season again, without credible evidence), after 6 years of absolute silence in America!


AUDIO: THIS IS A MUST-LISTEN TO RADIO INTERVIEW!


The radio interview with Roberts was based upon his recent column that we also posted on the blog called Impeach Now; Or Face the End of Constitutional Democracy , where he stated this:
Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran.

He maintains that the hijacked republican party, through the republican 2008 candidates (as the debates thus far have demonstrated), apart from the constitutional republican Ron Paul, represent nothing more than a continuity of an unpopular neocon-controlled President with a blueprint for a "new middle east" and domestic police state, and will therefore fail to win in 2008, (we can state in the same words as the Project for the New American Century penned it in September 2000), "...absent a catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor".


THIS IS A SOBER AND SERIOUS WAKE UP CALL BY A KNOWLEDGEABLE WASHINGTON INSIDER!

What is interesting is the bleak analysis of the republican party and its presidential candidates, due to its neoconservative (RINO) positions by the (media-supported) "leading candidates" was also mentioned by Gnewt Gingirch recently in a speech to an Zionist-based political group:
"Republican Newt Gingrich, in a jab at President Bush, warned on Friday that the GOP will lose the White House and Congress in 2008 if the nominee is perceived as a continuation of the Bush presidency."

Giuliani, Romney, and the undeclared "Law and (new world) Order" Thompson represent the very same neoconservative agenda as George W. Bush. Period. These are the neo-republican candidates, and only Ron Paul is an alternative (who defends the "just war" theory of Christianity, opposes abortion absolutely, defends 2nd ammendment rights, as well as the whole Bill of Rights, better than all of them, and has a track record to prove it).

Just look at all the polls here! --well over 60% disapproval! The majority of Americans are highly dissatisfied and hate this present government--but you would never get the neo-republican candidates to admit it, who want to continue it! Desperate times will lead to desperate acts. The American people will not be satisfied with these candidates' new late method of "Bush-bashing" (to create some perceived difference), with plastic bats, on immigration issues alone or saying he has merely "mismanaged the (neocon pre-planned, unjust, imperialist, without imminent threat") war" while also ignoring the growing domestic police state! So suddenly we see headlines like this: Republican '08 hopefuls seek distance from Bush, and "Bush-bashing" (a previous act of blasphemy against the Christian-feigning President, always an element in fascism), is now in vogue by republicans because it is practical!


REAGAN FIRED THE NEOCONSERVATIVES!

Returning to Craig Roberts, this sober Washington insider has written numerous columns (all worth reading!), as a republican, consistently against the neoconservatives and the constitution-trampling Bush administration, warning about the danger of their virtual coup since 9/11 in no uncertain terms. His experience and knowledge within the government during the Reagan administration enables him to speak and write with insight, and he informs or reminds listeners that "Reagan fired" the neoconservatives!


-----------------------------------------
This related news article below also, included in CLG's news alerts, smacks of the same type of craft and secrecy that Paul Craig Roberts writes about were a spectacular "second 9/11" to occur, about the government's continuity of operations. SECRECY IS A CONSISTENT MARK OF BUSH GOVERNMENT, and the historical mark of fifth column revolutionaries that design to overthrow governments from the inside, which is precisely what has happened since 9/11 based upon the tyrant's plea of "necessity".

Ore. Rep. asks to see gov't plans for aftermath of terror attack, denied access 20 Jul 2007 Oregonians called Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried in the classified portion of a White House plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack. As a member of the U.S. House on the Homeland Security Committee, DeFazio, D-Ore., is permitted to enter a secure "bubbleroom" in the Capitol and examine classified material. So he asked the White House to see the secret documents. On Wednesday, DeFazio got his answer: DENIED. "I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack," DeFazio says. Homeland Security Committee staffers told his office that the White House initially approved his request, but it was later quashed. "Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right," DeFazio said.

Jul 17, 2007

Impeach Now; Or Face the End of Constitutional Democracy

Paul Craig Roberts, from the Reagan administration, again warns of the anti-constitutional seizure of Executive powers, the saber-rattling about Iran, again, from Dick Cheney (see our other articles under the Cheney label) recently, and the "gut feeling" of Chertoff regarding summer terror "threats", along with the rest of the renewed terrorism propaganda lately, and what this all points toward. The time is almost up for the Bush administration and we have stated ourselves what this republican Washington insider himself asserts could very well take place. This is why we talk so much about fascism and totalitarianism of this administration, not because it is FELT, but because they have established (contrary to the Constitution) a new LEGAL FRAMEWORK from which totalitarian rule could be implemented, by the Executive Branch (of EITHER party in power), at any time. The definition of tyrannical government is arbitrary rule outside of established constitutional law, which the USA PATRIOT ACT(s), REAL ID, MEPHA laws, Homeland Security (America's Gestapo), and Military Commissions Act, etc., have established a legal framework for. Read his sobering article, and his warning that the present neoconservative-controlled administration must be stopped, using constitutional powers, for violations of its oath of office, and major breaches and violations of Constitutional rule of law. Ron Paul is the only republican candidate that would restore Constitutional government, but it is also possible 2008 elections, under Robert's scenario, might not even take place--unless the neoconservatives can get one of their pre-selected candidates (Rudy McRomney or Fred Thompson) into power, although the Israeli lobby also owns Hillary and Obama as well, and no others are trustworthy or would adhere to Constitutional principle strictly.

Impeach Now


Or Face the End of Constitutional Democracy
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18020.htm

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

07/17/07 "
ICH ' -- -- Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran.


Bush has put in place all the necessary measures for dictatorship in the form of "executive orders" that are triggered whenever Bush declares a national emergency. Recent statements by Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff, former Republican senator Rick Santorum and others suggest that Americans might expect a series of staged, or false flag, "terrorist" events in the near future.

Many attentive people believe that the reason the Bush administration will not bow to expert advice and public opinion and begin withdrawing US troops from Iraq is that the administration intends to rescue its unpopular position with false flag operations that can be used to expand the war to Iran.

Too much is going wrong for the Bush administration: the failure of its Middle East wars, Republican senators jumping ship, Turkish troops massed on northern Iraq's border poised for an invasion to deal with Kurds, and a majority of Americans favoring the impeachment of Cheney and a near-majority favoring Bush's impeachment. The Bush administration desperately needs dramatic events to scare the American people and the Congress back in line with the militarist-police state that Bush and Cheney have fostered.

William Norman Grigg recently wrote that the GOP is "praying for a terrorist strike" to save the party from electoral wipeout in 2008. Chertoff, Cheney, the neocon nazis, and Mossad would have no qualms about saving the bacon for the Republicans, who have enabled Bush to start two unjustified wars, with Iran waiting in the wings to be attacked in a third war.

The Bush administration has tried unsuccessfully to resurrect the terrorist fear factor by infiltrating some blowhard groups and encouraging them to talk about staging "terrorist" events. The talk, encouraged by federal agents, resulted in "terrorist" arrests hyped by the media, but even the captive media was unable to scare people with such transparent sting operations.

If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of "national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance.

A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the captive media as a vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention of which is to destroy all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states. Success would give the US control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to Israel's complete absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel.

Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were not in the works, why would Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the Chicago Tribune that Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has "a gut feeling" that America will soon be hit hard?

Why would Republican warmonger Rick Santorum say on the Hugh Hewitt radio show that "between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public's (sic) going to have a very different view of this war."

Throughout its existence the US government has staged incidents that the government then used in behalf of purposes that it could not otherwise have pursued. According to a number of writers, false flag operations have been routinely used by the Israeli state. During the Czarist era in Russia, the secret police would set off bombs in order to arrest those the secret police regarded as troublesome. Hitler was a dramatic orchestrator of false flag operations. False flag operations are a commonplace tool of governments.

Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?

Only a diehard minority believes in the honesty and integrity of the Bush-Cheney administration and in the truthfulness of the corporate media.

Hitler, who never achieved majority support in a German election, used the Reichstag fire to fan hysteria and push through the Enabling Act, which made him dictator. Determined tyrants never require majority support in order to overthrow constitutional orders.

The American constitutional system is near to being overthrown. Are coming "terrorist" events of which Chertoff warns and Santorum promises the means for overthrowing our constitutional democracy?

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com