Benghazi Attack was Blow-back for Obama's Secret Ops; Brennan Appointed CIA Chief to Cover-Up, Control Mess
The New York Times, and we hope Seymour Hersh in particular (see his articles on JSOC secret operation and stealth wars), will likely be all over this breaking story (see below) and new book which proves that the Obama Administration deliberately lied about the reasons for the Benghazi attack while tying together the loose ends that show why former CIA Chief Petraeus was removed (yes, by his own folly, but disclosed for a purpose) and why John Brennan has been appointed by Obama as CIA chief.
These secret JSOC black ops (outside of CIA oversight and authority) that are taking place under Obama's Executive Authority are similar to precisely what Hersh exposed was happening under the Bush Administration. Only the targets are different. This "connects the dots" as to why the Benghazi story was so (deliberately) muddled officially and the sudden (convenient) scandal which ousted David Petraeus from being CIA chief (who was kept in the dark about these ops).
Hey liberals, do you still trust Obama now? You did think that the scandal that brought down Petraeus and the official Benghazi story were a bit strange and somewhat related, didn't you? They did not pass the smell test and this article and book sheds a lot of light on these two controversies.
Like we posted earlier about the Benghazi attacks (see article below), it was a classic case of what the CIA calls "blow-back" for the Obama Administration's secret policies. Now you know the real reason that an "anti-Islamic video" on YouTube was blamed and why former Ambassador Susan Rice said what she said, when she did, in the running commentary. It's called Plausible Deniability of covert operations by insertion of a "cover story" into the official narrative of the Executive Branch. (It was for her personal loyalty that Obama staunchly defended Susan Rice against critics of her nomination for Secretary of State). And
now we know that even the CIA, namely Petraeus, was in the dark about what was going on and why they "needed him removed" (so they could cover their tracks with Brennan in an official capacity).
These secret JSOC black ops (outside of CIA oversight and authority) that are taking place under Obama's Executive Authority are similar to precisely what Hersh exposed was happening under the Bush Administration. Only the targets are different. This "connects the dots" as to why the Benghazi story was so (deliberately) muddled officially and the sudden (convenient) scandal which ousted David Petraeus from being CIA chief (who was kept in the dark about these ops).
Hey liberals, do you still trust Obama now? You did think that the scandal that brought down Petraeus and the official Benghazi story were a bit strange and somewhat related, didn't you? They did not pass the smell test and this article and book sheds a lot of light on these two controversies.
Like we posted earlier about the Benghazi attacks (see article below), it was a classic case of what the CIA calls "blow-back" for the Obama Administration's secret policies. Now you know the real reason that an "anti-Islamic video" on YouTube was blamed and why former Ambassador Susan Rice said what she said, when she did, in the running commentary. It's called Plausible Deniability of covert operations by insertion of a "cover story" into the official narrative of the Executive Branch. (It was for her personal loyalty that Obama staunchly defended Susan Rice against critics of her nomination for Secretary of State). And
now we know that even the CIA, namely Petraeus, was in the dark about what was going on and why they "needed him removed" (so they could cover their tracks with Brennan in an official capacity).
Brandon Webb, a former Navy SEAL, and Jack Murphy, a former Green Beret, reveal the new claims in their book 'Benghazi: The Definitive Report'
Petraeus was humiliated after a 'palace coup' by high-level intelligence
officers who did not like the way he was running the CIA
Posts
