Sep 26, 2007

Cheney Secretly Consulted with Israel about Bombing Iran to Spark War; Radical Neocon Presses Bush Privately

Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show it can bear discussion and publicity.
- Lord Acton

The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.
- Patrick Henry

Two sources on this very important news that will not make network media. Both of these confirm that there is in fact a conspiracy, secretive planning, led by Dick Cheney (member of the Project for New American Century) among the Jewish neoconservative Zionists, and Israel, to continue the push of their blueprint for a "new middle east" (Sept. 2000 blueprint), against Iran and Syria next, irregardless of the lack of evidence that either is a threat to the United States, or anyone else. Twisted quotes and rhetoric ("wipe Israel off the map") is used, complicitly with the Zionist controlled networks, to be a military statement instead of a political one disputing the legitimacy and oppressiveness of Israel. This is a lie as Ahmajinidad has plainly stated they have no desire for either a bomb or to start any wars.

Note the covert planning and discussion of Cheney with Israel, going around even President Bush and the Pentagon in contingency "war plans" or "scenarios". Cheney is the head of the neocons who developed the secretive Office of Special Plans to circumvent CIA and military intelligence, in order to lie and create disinformation to start a war with Iraq. The same stratagy is being used, but failing, so they are attempting to "provoke" war by any means possible. Note that Israel just DID BOMB SYRIA (something neocons like James Woolsey pushed a year ago, and this is the anniversary of the Lebanon bombing), violating their airspace and sovereignty, attempting to provoke war with Syria, which WOULD HAVE BEEN JUSTIFIED HAD SYRIA RETALIATED. There is no hard evidence the North Korea actually sent "nuclear components" to Syria for a bomb--only allegation and repetition as usual.

YOU WILL SEE AT THE BOTTOM THE DETAILED "PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN AGAINST IRAN STARTING IN SEPTEMBER" WAS PLANNED, AND THEREFORE THE "INVITATION" BY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TO HAVE AHMAJINIDAD SPEAK WAS PART OF THE WELL-ORCHESTRATED PLAN TO STIR UP CONTROVERSY AND DOMINATE THE NEWS. THIS EXPLAINS WHY IT WAS "OKAY" WITH BUSH THAT HE SPOKE AT COLUMBIA, AND THE NEOCON MEDIA SYCOPHANTS WERE ENCOURAGED TO STIR UP PROTESTS, AS WCHS LOCAL TALK RADIO DID. (See The Propaganda Plan below).


Cheney mulled Israeli strike on Iran: Newsweek
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:06pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Vice President Dick Cheney had at one point considered asking Israel to launch limited missile strikes at an Iranian nuclear site to provoke a retaliation, Newsweek magazine reported on Sunday.

The news comes amid reports that Israel launched an air strike against Syria this month over a suspected nuclear site.

Citing two unidentified sources, Newsweek said former Cheney Middle East adviser David Wurmser told a small group several months ago that Cheney was considering asking Israel to strike the Iranian nuclear site at Natanz.

Podhoretz Granted Secret Access To Lobby Bush On ‘The Case For Bombing Iran’

npodhoretz.gif

Norman Podhoretz, the “patriarch of neoconservatism,” recently published a book entitled “World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism,” staunchly supporting the Iraq war and pushing for war with Iran. In June, Podhoretz published a controversial piece in Commentary magazine titled “The Case for Bombing Iran.

The Politico reports today that President Bush has been listening to Podhoretz’s radical agenda, recently enlisting Podhoretz to discuss his views on Iran. In a meeting that “was not on the president’s public schedule,” Bush and Karl Rove “sat listening to Norman Podhoretz for roughly 45 minutes at the White House”:

Rove was silent throughout, though he took notes. The president listened diligently, Podhoretz said as he recounted the conversation months later, but he “didn’t tip his hand.”

“I did say to [the president], that people ask: Why are you spending all this time negotiating sanctions? Time is passing. I said, my friend [Robert] Kagan wrote a column which he said you were giving ‘futility its chance.’ And both he and Karl Rove burst out laughing.

“It struck me,” Podhoretz added, “that if they really believed that there was a chance for these negotiations and sanctions to work, they would not have laughed. They would have got their backs up and said, ‘No, no, it’s not futile, there’s a very good chance.’”

President Bush has loyally supported Podhoretz’s agenda in the past. In 2004, he bestowed the Presidential Medal of Freedom — the nation’s highest civilian honor — on Podhoretz, calling him a “fierce intellectual man” with “fine writing and a “great love for our country.”

Today, Podhoretz’s calls for bombing Iran are being echoed in the administration. According to Newsweek, Vice President Cheney considered a plan to allow Israel to conduct missile strikes against Iran “in an effort to draw a military response from Iran, which could in turn spark a U.S. offensive against targets in the Islamic Republic.”

Podhoretz has argued that “if we were to bomb the Iranians as I hope and pray we will…we’ll unleash a wave of anti-Americanism all over the world that will make the anti-Americanism we’ve experienced so far look like a lovefest.” By enlisting Podhoretz’s advice, President Bush is demonstrating that there isn’t any idea too radical for him to consider.

THE PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN

Attack on Iran: the PR campaign picks up speed

The latest signal came from George Bush, warning of a “nuclear holocaust” if Iran gets The Bomb (despite an IAEA report that Iran isn’t as much of a threat as Bush claims). There can’t be any more provocative words than “nuclear holocaust” to justify the purported prevention of one. Nor can there be any doubt that, with such freighted language, combined with the accusation that Iran is arming insurgents and terrorists in Iraq and that a substantial portion of its army is a terrorist organization, the propaganda campaign to soften us up for The Announcement is accelerating or that an attack, whether it actually happens or not, is solidly in the works.

The New York Times headline put it mildly, not even mentioning Iran. The Guardian was somewhat less reserved. Even less so is Gareth Porter, who homes in on Dick Cheney and Joseph Lieberman as being behind the push for war with Iran......

..........It’s Juan Cole who pins the propaganda campaign down with this August 30th tidbit, a couple of times removed from the source, but then Cole is pretty reliable:

Barnett Rubin relays a message from a well-connected friend in Washington on the Cheney Administration’s plans to roll out a military confrontation with Iran in September. He writes at the Global Affairs blog:

” My friend had spoken to someone in one of the leading neo-conservative institutions. He summarized what he was told this way:

They [the source’s institution] have “instructions” (yes, that was the word used) from the Office of the Vice-President to roll out a campaign for war with Iran in the week after Labor Day; it will be coordinated with the American Enterprise Institute, the Wall Street Journal, the Weekly Standard, Commentary, Fox, and the usual suspects. It will be heavy sustained assault on the airwaves, designed to knock public sentiment into a position from which a war can be maintained. Evidently they don’t think they’ll ever get majority support for this–they want something like 35-40 percent support, which in their book is “plenty.”
Note:

THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY APPEARANCE OF AHMADINEJAD, BY "INVITATION", WHICH WE SHOWED IN PREVIOUS ARTICLE THAT BUSH DID NOT OBJECT TO, WAS ALL PART OF THAT WELL ORCHESTRATED PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN TO STIR UP CONTROVERSY, AND DOMINATE THE NEWS, PER THIS PLAN ABOVE.