Dec 7, 2007

Pearl Harbor: Day of Deceit; and its Relevance to 9/11

Americans are rather superstitious when it comes to remembering historical events and sentimentalism (the purpose behind memorials) usually trumps truth, as the propagandists prefer. If Americans knew more accurately the facts behind the history they would be more wary and fearful of trusting the federal government, and see how far it has rebelled against its own Constitution and strayed from the very basis of its own independence from Britain's tyranny. They would stop painting Presidents as if they were good Christian men or making judgments as if one political party is good and the other evil. Today, Pearl Harbor Day, is a good time to call attention to this, and the context of the continuing "war on terrorism" (a key subject with the 2008 candidates) should be considered in light of the truth behind Pearl Harbor.

Americans have been far too trusting of their government until the "new Pearl Harbor", 9/11, came into play and was used to justify pre-emptive wars. After 9/11 many Americans began to question the official story of that event in light of the evidence, especially given the following:

1. The WTC Towers' perfect symmetrical, exploding collapse at virtual free-fall speed (a physical impossibility in mere collapse), which had all the appearance of controlled demolition, and especially in that the towers were designed to sustain multiple impacts of 707 airliners, and that fires never destroy steel towers.

2. The government's official story, along with media interviews with neoconservative "experts", that Arab hijackers and Usama bin Laden, (later called Islamic jihadists "who hate us because we are free"), were blamed immediatelydespite the lack of evidence, and contrary to the denials of such by bin Laden and the Taliban alike in foreign press.

3. The lack of any identifiable plane wreckage at the WTC, the Pentagon, or in Shanksville; the lack of autopsies or any identification or recovery of "Arab hijackers" on the flights.

4. That simultaneous war games were coincidentally in operation on 9/11, which provided ideal cover and confusion for the FAA that day, which also involved hijacking scenarios and tied up NORAD operations from scrambling planes.

5. That Pres. Bush stated in two town halls in Dec. '01 and Jan. '02 that he had seen the first "plane hit the tower" on "a TV", prior to entering the classroom of the Florida elementary school, where subsequently he was notified of the second attack. It is impossible for him to have seen the first tower strike on a TV unless prior arrangements were made to monitor the "surprise attack" live!

6. That the neoconservatives (including Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, James Woolsey, Dov Zakheim, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, et al who filled strategic positions in the Bush administration, Pentagon, and media sources as "terrorism experts", had written a blueprint for a "new middle east", advocating what they called "global hegemony" and regime changes in Iraq, Iran, Syria, etc., which they had (under the Project for a New American Century) published in Sept. 2000, with these interesting words:

"The process of transformation [Ed. aggressive global American military adventurism] could be a long one, absent a catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor".
How perfectly 9/11 was then touted to be a "new Pearl Harbor", by Charles Krauthammer (a neocon writing for the Washington Post) and George W. Bush within 24 hours! Could their "catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor" and 9/11 be just a mere coincidence, of which also the official story does not fit the reliable evidence? It is difficult to deny that those who benefited most from 9/11 were the neoconservatives and their agenda, and Israel.

New Yorkers were among the first skeptics, as they should be having the most immediate interest. A Zoby poll in Aug. 2004 stated this:

Half of New Yorkers Believe US Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9-11 Attacks and “Consciously Failed” To Act; 66% Call For New Probe of Unanswered Questions by Congress or New York’s Attorney General, New Zogby International Poll Reveals
Then a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll of Americans over a year ago showed that Americans have begun to think more critically about the official version of government events, and its motives for war:

More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.
And even a more recent Zogby poll, Sept. 2007, went largely unreported by the media that summarized the following:

Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment

67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7
It is evident then that Americans are scrutinizing the federal government, particularly the Executive branch, and its official stories and pretexts for war more closely with greater skepticism. Yet many Americans are either in cognitive dissonance when confronted with the evidence or resist such "conspiracy theories" with this question: "Who would think that anyone in our government would be involved in the death of so many Americans?" A new examination of Pearl Harbor demonstrates that deceit and lies, even conspiracy to permit or enact "attacks", is not beyond the pale of what elements within the government have done in the past. This is sufficient in fact to prove that Americans have been deliberately lied to and tricked before, in the most sinister manner, in order to push Americans into war.

Read for yourself this incredible book, by a very credible author, below about FDR's deliberate plan to provoke a Japanese attack (using the Pacific Fleet put way out to sea as bait) in order to get the U.S. to enter Britain's war against Germany, when Americans and Congress had no desire to enter that war. This puts 9/11 and the neoconservatives "new Pearl Harbor", and trust in U.S. government, in new light.

Note this featured book can be purchased through our bookstore at the bottom of the blog via Amazon.
Pearl Harbor 1941
dayofdeceitcover.jpg (15470 bytes)

Day of Deceit...Uncovers the secret military documents withheld from Congress and the American public for over sixty years. For the first time in publishing you can read and examine the key

  • The US Navy's eight point Overt Act of War strategy adopted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt that lured Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.

  • The 1941 Japanese naval radio intercepts.

  • Presidential and U.S. Army and Naval dispatches ordering American Pacific commanders to stand aside and let Japan commit the first overt act of war.

  • Discover six years of Pearl Harbor hoaxes intended to deceive the American public and congress.

  • Follow the Japanese naval spy who was allowed carte blanche to spy on and prepare bomb plots of Pearl Harbor.

Pearl Harbor was not an accident, a mere failure of American intelligence, or a brilliant Japanese military coup.
It was the result of a carefully orchestrated design, originated in the Office of Naval