Ron Paul versus the Terror World

Blog entry that criticizes recent editorial in WSJ about Ron Paul.

The WSJ argument confirms that Ron Paul indeed is the only candidate for limited government (that the Constitution prescribes and Reagan advocated) while pushing that it is inappropriate for a "terror world" which must require a radical and insanely irrational agenda to "kill them before they kill us" policy that makes paranoid lunatics look like "conservatives". In typical form MSM articles say Paul is "kooky" in order to diminish him as a serious candidate ("we report, you decide"?) through obvious media interventionism, which this article plainly refutes. Great analysis for particularly republicans to consider, if they dare to re-evaluate the new republican establishment's repetitious dogma that threatens our freedom while claiming to defend it.

read more | digg story